Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Dark and Stormy Knight

August 18th 2008 12:45
To say that The Dark Knight has been hotly anticipated would be a gross understatement.

And while the film would undoubtadly have been a huge success, Heath Ledgers death did give it a certain air of mystique.
You see, it's been a big year for super-hero movies. From drunk ones to green ones to metal ones it's been a mixed bag. And with the exception of a certain crystal skull film, they've all been pretty good.

I tried not to get caught up in the Dark Knight wave of positivity. I went to see it three weeks ago and then stewed over it before going to see it again.
On second viewing it wasn't the masterpiece I first thought although it was close. And it occured to me on seeing it again what a horrific shame it is that Heath Ledger is gone because his Joker is even more astonishing on second viewing.
Let's face it, a review of Dark Knight is a review of Ledgers performance first and the rest of the film second.
And it is a really good film filled with great performances, great action, more explosions than you could possibly shake a stick at and a dark, menacing feel that befits a film about a weirdo who dresses up as a bat. It has a good plot (if a little muddled) which I'm not going to delve into because, frankly, I'm not a commited enough writer.
Instead I'm going to talk aimlessly about the good and bad bits/people that stick out in no particular order.
First up, I have a problem with Christian Bales voice when in bat mode. I just couldn't get comfortable with it. Sounds to forced and put on. I wanted him to just hack up that furball and clear his throat. I'm also not a fan of the new bat mobile and bat bike. Far to bulky and clunky for my liking. And god knows how much fuel they guzzled. He should have driven the Lambourghini more as far as I'm concerned.

On the acting front, well where do I start.
Gary Oldman has long been my favourite actor and he's great in this. There's nothing showy about the part, just all quiet and restraint. His best part in years.
Maggie Gyllenhaal is starting to overshadow her brother with a string of good parts and she's good here too.
Aaron Eckhart is all dashing and handsome as Harvey Dent and goes convincingly ga-ga after his one sided face peel.
Morgan Freeman and Michael Caine, while both coasting, do add a bit of old class to the show.
Christian Bale is a sometimes brilliant actor but I just can't be convinced by him as Batman. Sure he looks the part of Bruce Wayne, all handsome and charismatic, but for mine he just looks out of place just as he did in Batman Begins.
And how nice it was to see Eric Roberts (Julia's brother don't you know) having some fun as mobster Sal Maroni.
And then there's Heath Ledger.

Everything you've heard about his Joker is true. It's a creepy, disturbing, charismatic and mesmerising turn that in some ways is too strong for the film. Every time he's off screen the film suffers. And it's not the grotesque face or the purple suit or greasy hair that gets you, it's the voice. He reportedly took weeks to perfect it and it shows. It slithers out of his mouth and wraps itself around the screen making you're neck hairs stand on end.
The best performance of the year bar none.
But as good as Heath ledger is , I don't want him to win an after death Oscar. Let's not insult the man by giving him an award the Academy would never have had the courage to give him were he still alive.
It's a landmark performance that doesn't need to be validated by a silly statue.
A memorable film.
8/10












39
Vote
Shared on
   


A LOOK AT HANCOCK

July 8th 2008 11:51
Drunk & Disorderly


This shoulda been great. What it turns out to be is an exercise in massive plot holes and ricocheting story lines which spiral out of control.
And the biggest pity of all is that the first half of the film is great. Will Smith sizzles as anti-hero Hancock - a drunk and disorderly superhero who while catching the bad guys tends to leave a multi-million dollar trail of destruction in his path.
He's completely unlikeable, even going as far as threatening an old lady with physical violence. It's a credit to Smith who's usually cinemas most likeable actor.
His life changes when he saves the life of PR guy Ray Embrey (Jason Bateman who's also great) who is in the process of trying to change the world. Ray takes it upon himself to give Hancock an image and personality makeover. And this is when the film hits its spots. Smith is well believable as the guy who starts to show he has a soft side and does care what people think of him. Bateman is equally good as the guy trying to drag the goodness out of him. The scenes between the two are the films best.
It's only when Charlize Theron goes from being Rays caring wife to something else completely that the film starts to unravel. And this is not Therons fault. In fact she's as good as the two male leads.
The problem lies with the script writers. It just seems that they suddenly panicked and thought they better start using the special effects department more or no-one will come and watch. We go from really origional for the first hour to really gone for the last 45 mins.
They should have shown some restraint and maybe waited for a possible sequel to unleash the mayhem. In saying that I liked a lot more about this film than I hated. It would be great to give Smith another crack at this guy because it's some of the best work he's done.
And if they can't mend the damage with a sequel..............then leave it at that.
If only, if only.
6.5/10

33
Vote
Shared on
   


QUESTIONS QUESTIONS QUESTIONS

June 29th 2008 05:25
To many questions and not enough answers.
If you have the answers to life, the universe and everything then go away. But if you have the answers to these questions then come on down.

1. WHY DO PEOPLE KEEP GREENLIGHTING MIKE MYERS MOVIES?
not funny
NOT FUNNY?

2. WHY HAVE 10 STAR TREK FILMS BEEN MADE (with another in the pipeline) WHEN 1 WOULD SURELY HAVE BEEN ENOUGH?

3. IS TOM HANKS REALLY THAT GOOD?

4. IS JAMIE LEE CURTIS REALLY JAMES LEE CURTIS?
JAMES?

5. DOES HOLLYWOOD STILL THINK TONI COLLETTE IS UGLY?

6. WHAT IS THE POINT OF JAMES BOND?

7. DID ARNOLD SCHWARZENNEGER REALLY BECOME A GOVERNOR OR WAS IT ALL A BIZARRE DREAM?

8. AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO THINKS SEAN CONNERY CAN'T REALLY ACT?

9. WHY CAN'T SYLVESTER STALLONE REMEMBER HOW GOOD HE WAS IN COPLAND?

10. WHY WAS GOODFELLAS SO BLOODY PERFECT?

11. IS MICKEY ROURKE STILL ALIVE? WHY?

12. DID ANYONE EVER UNDERSTAND A WORD BRANDO SAID?
PARDON!

13. IS DANIEL DAY LEWIS ALL THERE?

14. WHY DOES MARGARET POMERANZ USE THE TERM - " I HAD A DIFFICULT RELATIONSHIP WITH THIS MOVIE"? WHAT IS SHE TALKING ABOUT?

15. WHO WILL PLAY GEORGE 'DUBIYA' BUSH IN THE INEVITABLE FILM ABOUT HIS LIFE?
WHO'S A CLEVER BOY THEN?

16. WHY WAS THE LAST INDIANA JONES FILM UTTER SHITE?

17. WHY DON'T THEY JUST USE IRISH ACTORS IN IRISH ROLES IN AMERICAN MOVIES AND AVOID THE EMBARRASMENT FOR CRUISE, DI CAPRIO, VOIGHT ETC?

18. WHEN DID AL PACINO TURN ORANGE?
SOOOO NATURAL

19. DOES ANYONE REALLY LIKE TOM CRUISE?

20. WHY IS STAR WARS SO POPULAR? I MEAN, IT'S RUBBISH.

21. WHEN WILL I BE KING?

THERES MORE BUT I'M COOKING DINNER TONIGHT.

LATER TREKKIES








31
Vote
Shared on
   


JOLLY GREEN GIANT ----HULK REVIEW

June 28th 2008 07:59
The main thing that sets this film apart from the 2003 Ang Lee effort is that the Hulk actually has a nemesis and is not merely trying to outrun the military. It gives it a more rounded feel as a film because as everyone knows - all super heroes (and I'm still not sure I see the Hulk as a Hero) need an arch nemesis just like cornflakes need milk.
The hulk in this film also has a better look. Plenty of pumping veins and a nice dark shade of green, as opposed to the bright green desert hopper of Lee's film.
Casting Norton as Banner is a marked improvement on Eric Bana's moody, sulky sook. While the role doesn't need Norton to stretch his considerable acting muscle he does bring the right amount of anguish to Banner. He looks suitably execerbated at having the worlds worst temper


[ Click here to read more ]
41
Vote
Shared on
   


A to Z of baddies

June 4th 2008 07:38
This wasn't as easy as you'd think.

A. Annie Wilkes (Misery) Ended up pushing the dessert trolley at local eatery. Played by Kathy Bates


[ Click here to read more ]
35
Vote
Shared on
   


Crystal skulls and spaceships

May 30th 2008 10:36
If Spielberg and co were looking to provide two hours of good popcorn entertainment, well they succeeded. If they were trying to create a fitting final chapter in the Indiana Jones saga, they failed.
It's been 19 years and it shows. What this film lacked was some touches of 1980's Spielberg. It had far too much Spielberg and Lucas circa 2008.
After a great first 20 minutes or so it just fades away with the exception of a couple of good scenes. The film starts in a familiar looking warehouse with Indiana forced to help the Russians locate a powerful crystal skull. After they get what they're after we get a great chase sequence followed by a classic Spielberg scene involving atomic bomb testing and a lead lined fridge. So far so good


[ Click here to read more ]
45
Vote
Shared on
   


TERRY GILLIAMS BROTHERS GRIMM

May 24th 2008 02:17
With nothing on the box last night I went through my DVD stash and came across The Brothers Grimm. And after a moment I realised I'd never watched it. It must be one of those cheap movies I pick up in the $10 baskets from time to time. Anyway, I stuck it on.
Terry Gilliam never makes a straight forward movie. And I imagine if he could have the final cut he wants, not what the studio suits want, his films would be even more bizarre.
Which would be a good thing. So this one stars Matt Damon (Will) and Heath Ledger (Jacob) as the brothers of the title. Seemingly based (very very loosely) on the German brothers who wrote a host of grim and scary fairy tales including Little Red Riding Hood among others


[ Click here to read more ]
49
Vote
Shared on
   


U23D

May 18th 2008 12:17
Concert Films are a funny beast. Trying to capture the essence of live performance never truly works. Some concert films come close but ultimately It can only be a live album with moving pictures.
U23D is the closest to a perfect concert film that I've seen. Liking or hating U2 -and there are millions in both camps- shouldn't really come in to it. While it will undoubtadly help, even non U2 fans will appreciate the mind-blowing spectical this is.
After seeing this with a friend who is NOT a U2 fan I can safely say that, while not converted to the good church of Bono and co, he couldn't help but admire the fact that it really worked


[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
Shared on
   


MY 15 ACTORS.....MALE

March 20th 2008 13:55
Hey, I'm bored again. My top twenty male actors, not the best 20 ever. I'm putting them in no particular order although the first one is my favourite. Here goes.......

GARY OLDMAN


[ Click here to read more ]
70
Vote
Shared on
   


MY TOP 20

March 18th 2008 13:13
Thought I'd put down my top 20 films in no particular order. Don't know why. Maybe it's boredom. Or maybe it's the misguided belief that someone else might care. No, it's boredom, definitely. Well here goes.

GOODFELLAS(ok, this is my no 1


[ Click here to read more ]
101
Vote
Shared on
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
13 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Stephen Somers's Blogs

48 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
Moderated by Stephen Somers
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]